Site icon The Word 360

Glycemic Variability: How to Calculate and Lower Your Score

Glycemic Variability:

Glycemic Variability:

&Tab;&Tab;<div class&equals;"wpcnt">&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<div class&equals;"wpa">&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<span class&equals;"wpa-about">Advertisements<&sol;span>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<div class&equals;"u top&lowbar;amp">&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<amp-ad width&equals;"300" height&equals;"265"&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab; type&equals;"pubmine"&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab; data-siteid&equals;"173035871"&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab; data-section&equals;"1">&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;<&sol;amp-ad>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<&sol;div>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<&sol;div>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;<&sol;div><p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Glycemic variability explained&colon; learn how to calculate your score from CGM data&comma; what a healthy number looks like&comma; and simple ways to lower it&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2><b>Table of Contents<&sol;b><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<ol>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Key Takeaways<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">What Glycemic Variability Means<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">The Numbers Behind Your CGM Report<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">How to Calculate Your Glycemic Variability Score<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">What a Healthy Score Looks Like<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">How to Lower Glycemic Variability<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Why Your Score May Be Wrong<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Limits and When to See a Doctor<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">The Gap in the Evidence<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Frequently Asked Questions<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">References and Sources<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<&sol;ol>&NewLine;<h2><b>Key Takeaways<&sol;b><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<ul>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Glycemic variability describes how much your blood sugar swings up and down during the day&period; Two people can share the same average and have very different swings&period;<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">The most common score is the coefficient of variation &lpar;CV&rpar;&comma; which is your standard deviation divided by your average glucose&comma; shown as a percentage&period;<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">An international consensus sets a CV of 36 percent or lower as the target for people with diabetes&period; Healthy adults in a 2019 study averaged about 17 percent&period;<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">You can calculate CV in a spreadsheet with one line of math once you export your raw CGM readings&period;<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">A short walk after meals and eating vegetables and protein first have the best evidence for cutting post meal swings&period;<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Compression lows and sensor noise can add false swings&comma; so check odd spikes and dips before you trust the score&period;<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<&sol;ul>&NewLine;<h2><b>Your Average Glucose Can Hide a Rollercoaster<&sol;b><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Picture two people who both have an average glucose of 100 mg&sol;dL&period; One stays between 85 and 115 all day&period; The other swings between 60 and 160&period; A single average treats them the same&comma; yet their days look completely different&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">The same gap shows up in the standard lab test&period; The international consensus on continuous glucose monitoring &lpar;CGM&rpar; points out that A1C&comma; the three month average blood sugar test&comma; fails to capture the size and frequency of ups and downs within a day or from one day to the next&period; Glycemic variability is the number built to fill that gap&period; This guide shows how it is calculated&comma; what a good score looks like&comma; and what actually lowers it&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2><b>What Glycemic Variability Means<&sol;b><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Glycemic variability is a plain idea&period; It measures how far your glucose strays from your own average over time&period; A low score means your line stays smooth&period; A high score means big peaks and valleys&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">There are many formulas&comma; but they fall into two groups&period; Some measure spread around your average&comma; such as standard deviation&period; Others count only the large swings&comma; such as MAGE&comma; which stands for mean amplitude of glycemic excursions&period; MAGE needs special software&comma; so most people use the first group&period; The one that the experts agreed on for routine care is the coefficient of variation&comma; or CV&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2><b>The Numbers Behind Your CGM Report<&sol;b><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">The 2019 international consensus&comma; published in Diabetes Care&comma; lists a standard set of CGM numbers&period; Four of them matter most when you read your own report&colon;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<ul>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Standard deviation &lpar;SD&rpar;&colon; the typical distance your readings sit from your average&comma; in mg&sol;dL&period;<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Coefficient of variation &lpar;CV&rpar;&colon; SD divided by your mean&comma; multiplied by 100&period; The consensus target is 36 percent or lower&period;<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Time in range &lpar;TIR&rpar;&colon; the share of the day between 70 and 180 mg&sol;dL&period; For most adults with diabetes&comma; the consensus goal is more than 70 percent&period;<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Glucose management indicator &lpar;GMI&rpar;&colon; an estimate of your A1C from your CGM average&period; The formula is 3&period;31 plus 0&period;02392 times your average glucose in mg&sol;dL&period;<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<&sol;ul>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Notice that GMI and TIR describe where your glucose sits&comma; while SD and CV describe how much it moves&period; You need both kinds to see the full picture&period; A tidy average with a high CV is a warning that your control comes from swings that cancel each other out&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2><b>How to Calculate Your Glycemic Variability Score<&sol;b><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Many CGM apps and clinic reports already show CV&period; If yours does not&comma; you can work it out yourself in a few minutes&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<ol>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Export your raw readings as a spreadsheet file from your CGM app or its web portal&period; Use at least 7 days&comma; and 14 days is better&period;<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Put the glucose values in one column and remove any blank cells&period;<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Find the average with the formula AVERAGE of that column&period;<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Find the standard deviation with the formula STDEV&period;S of that column&period;<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Divide the standard deviation by the average and multiply by 100&period; That is your CV&period;<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<&sol;ol>&NewLine;<h3><b>A Worked Example<&sol;b><&sol;h3>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Take six readings across a day&colon; 90&comma; 110&comma; 150&comma; 120&comma; 95&comma; and 85 mg&sol;dL&period; The average is about 108 mg&sol;dL&period; The standard deviation is about 24 mg&sol;dL&period; Dividing 24 by 108 gives 0&period;22&comma; so the CV is about 22 percent&period; Real CGM data has a reading every few minutes&comma; which gives hundreds of points per day and a steadier result&period; The same average gives a GMI of about 5&period;9 percent&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Spreadsheets and apps can differ slightly because some use the sample formula and others the population formula for standard deviation&period; Pick one method and keep it the same so your results stay comparable&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2><b>What a Healthy Score Looks Like<&sol;b><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">There is no official CV target for healthy people&comma; but there is a useful benchmark&period; In the 2019 study by Viral Shah and colleagues&comma; healthy&comma; nonobese adults had an average CV of 17 percent&comma; with a spread of plus or minus 3&period; A 2018 study in healthy children and teenagers found CVs of 15 to 16 percent&period; A 2010 study of 74 healthy people aged 9 to 65 found glucose between 71 and 120 mg&sol;dL for 91 percent of the day&comma; and found night readings slightly lower than daytime ones&comma; at 95 versus 99 mg&sol;dL&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">The 36 percent line is the upper limit for people with diabetes&comma; set so that low blood sugar events stay rare&period; It is not a goal for healthy people&period; If your CV sits around 15 to 25 percent&comma; you are in or near the range seen in healthy groups&period; If it runs far above that&comma; look at your meals&comma; your movement&comma; and your sensor before you worry&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2><b>How to Lower Glycemic Variability<&sol;b><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Most variability in healthy people comes from meals&period; Three habits have trial evidence behind them&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<h3><b>Walk After Meals<&sol;b><&sol;h3>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">In a 2016 trial from the University of Otago&comma; 41 adults with type 2 diabetes walked 10 minutes after each meal and had after meal glucose about 12 percent lower than with a single 30 minute walk at another time&period; The drop was 22 percent after dinner&period; A 2022 review in Sports Medicine pooled seven studies and found that light walking breaks cut glucose by an average of 17 percent compared with sitting for long periods&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<h3><b>Eat Vegetables and Protein First<&sol;b><&sol;h3>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">In a small 2015 pilot study at Weill Cornell&comma; 11 people with type 2 diabetes had glucose that was about 29&comma; 37&comma; and 17 percent lower at 30&comma; 60&comma; and 120 minutes when they ate protein and vegetables before the carbohydrates&period; The sample is small&comma; so test it on your own sensor&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<h3><b>Reduce the Size of Your Biggest Spike<&sol;b><&sol;h3>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Variability is driven by your highest points&period; Find the one meal that produces your tallest peak&comma; change one thing about it&comma; and compare your CV over the next week&period; A change that lowers that single peak often lowers the whole day&&num;8217&semi;s score&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2><b>Why Your Score May Be Wrong<&sol;b><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">A variability score is only as good as the data behind it&period; Three things can inflate it&colon;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<ul>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Compression lows&period; When you sleep on your sensor&comma; pressure can make it read falsely low&comma; which adds a sharp dip that did not happen in your blood&period;<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Sensor noise and the first day&period; Many sensors read less accurately in their first 24 hours&comma; so consider leaving day one out&period;<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Gaps and mixed devices&period; Missing hours and switching brands change the average and the spread&period;<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<&sol;ul>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Look at your graph before you trust the number&period; If a sudden overnight cliff sits right where you rolled onto your arm&comma; it is probably not real&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2><b>Limits and When to See a Doctor<&sol;b><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">A CGM variability score is a wellness tool and not a diagnosis&period; See a doctor if your readings often pass 140 mg&sol;dL after meals&comma; if you see repeated lows with symptoms such as shaking or sweating&comma; or if you are on insulin or diabetes pills and notice a change in your pattern&period; Do not change medicine on your own based on a score&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2><b>The Gap in the Evidence<&sol;b><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">The 36 percent target comes from studies in people with diabetes&period; The healthy benchmarks come from small groups using one sensor type&period; No large trial has shown that lowering glycemic variability in healthy adults improves long term health&period; Until that evidence exists&comma; treat your CV as a way to see your own patterns&comma; and not as a pass or fail grade&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2><b>Frequently Asked Questions<&sol;b><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p><b>What is a good glycemic variability score&quest;<&sol;b><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">For people with diabetes&comma; the consensus target for CV is 36 percent or lower&period; Healthy adults averaged about 17 percent in a 2019 study&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><b>How is glycemic variability calculated&quest;<&sol;b><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">The most common method is the coefficient of variation&period; Divide the standard deviation of your glucose readings by your average glucose and multiply by 100&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><b>Is glycemic variability the same as time in range&quest;<&sol;b><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">No&period; Time in range shows how much of the day you spend in a target zone&period; Variability shows how much your glucose moves&period; You can have a good time in range and still have large swings&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><b>Can I lower glycemic variability without medicine&quest;<&sol;b><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Meal habits can help&comma; including a short walk after eating and vegetables and protein first&period; Talk to a doctor if you have diabetes or if your numbers stay high&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><b>Does a high score mean I have diabetes&quest;<&sol;b><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">No&period; A CGM score is not a diagnosis&period; Diabetes is diagnosed with lab tests that a doctor interprets&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><b>How many days of data do I need&quest;<&sol;b><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">At least 7 days&comma; and 14 days gives a steadier picture&period; Leave out the first day of a new sensor if its readings look unstable&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2><b>References and Sources<&sol;b><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<ol>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Battelino T&comma; Danne T&comma; Bergenstal RM&comma; et al&period; Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation&colon; Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range&period; Diabetes Care&comma; 2019&period; https&colon;&sol;&sol;pmc&period;ncbi&period;nlm&period;nih&period;gov&sol;articles&sol;PMC6973648<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Bergenstal RM&comma; Beck RW&comma; Close KL&comma; et al&period; Glucose Management Indicator &lpar;GMI&rpar;&colon; A New Term for Estimating A1C From Continuous Glucose Monitoring&period; Diabetes Care&comma; 2018&period; https&colon;&sol;&sol;doi&period;org&sol;10&period;2337&sol;dc18-1581<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Shah VN&comma; DuBose SN&comma; Li Z&comma; et al&period; Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles in Healthy Nondiabetic Participants&colon; A Multicenter Prospective Study&period; Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism&comma; 2019&period; https&colon;&sol;&sol;pmc&period;ncbi&period;nlm&period;nih&period;gov&sol;articles&sol;PMC7296129<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group&period; Variation of Interstitial Glucose Measurements Assessed by Continuous Glucose Monitors in Healthy&comma; Nondiabetic Individuals&period; Diabetes Care&comma; 2010&period; https&colon;&sol;&sol;pmc&period;ncbi&period;nlm&period;nih&period;gov&sol;articles&sol;PMC2875442<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles in Healthy Non Diabetic Children and Adolescents&colon; A Multicenter Prospective Study&period; ESPE Abstracts&comma; 2018&period; https&colon;&sol;&sol;abstracts&period;eurospe&period;org&sol;hrp&sol;0089&sol;hrp0089FC12&period;1<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Diabetes on the Net&period; Time in range and standard CGM metrics&comma; including the coefficient of variation &lpar;standard deviation divided by mean&comma; target 36 percent or lower&rpar;&period; https&colon;&sol;&sol;diabetesonthenet&period;com&sol;wp-content&sol;uploads&sol;pdf&sol;dotna3113ee67807369a6a35093298812fdc&period;pdf<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Reynolds AN&comma; Mann JI&comma; Williams S&period; Walking after meals and blood sugar in type 2 diabetes&period; Diabetologia&comma; 2016&period; University of Otago summary&colon; https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;otago&period;ac&period;nz&sol;cvd&sol;news&sol;archive&sol;short-walks-after-meals-may-prove-important-tool-in-managing-diabetes<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Buffey AJ&comma; Herring MP&comma; Langley CK&period; The acute effects of interrupting prolonged sitting time with standing and light intensity walking on biomarkers of cardiometabolic health in adults&colon; a systematic review and meta analysis&period; Sports Medicine&comma; 2022&period; Commentary&colon; https&colon;&sol;&sol;naturalmedicinejournal&period;com&sol;journal&sol;walking-is-better-than-standing<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">Shukla AP&comma; Iliescu RG&comma; Thomas CE&comma; Aronne LJ&period; Food Order Has a Significant Impact on Postprandial Glucose and Insulin Levels&period; Diabetes Care&comma; 2015&period; https&colon;&sol;&sol;pmc&period;ncbi&period;nlm&period;nih&period;gov&sol;articles&sol;PMC4876745<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<li style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400"><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">CGM Is Reading Low Values at Night&colon; Causes and Solutions&period; University of Michigan Eisenberg Family Depression Center&period; https&colon;&sol;&sol;deepblue&period;lib&period;umich&period;edu&sol;items&sol;d9ac007e-e4fa-4687-8d9d-40017e4ee138<&sol;span><&sol;li>&NewLine;<&sol;ol>&NewLine;<p><b>ABIODUN EMMANUEL<&sol;b><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><span style&equals;"font-weight&colon; 400">An SEO content writer focused on creating clear&comma; persuasive&comma; and engaging content&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version